THEO1342 · University and Capstone

Peaceful Ethics: Social Action Leadership Methods

Morrissey College of Arts & Sciences

Numerical ratings

4.1 / 5Course rating

From 2 rating records
Across 1 instructor

Older rating records summarize course sections and may have no written feedback. New reviews add ratings and a comment. How scores work

Written reviews 0

Write a review

No written reviews yet

Numerical ratings and written feedback are separate. Be the first to share what you wish you’d known before taking this course.

Who teaches this? 1

Both ratings are out of 5, for each instructor’s sections of THEO1342.

Richard Nielsen

Professor, Management & Organization · CSOM

2 evaluations for this course

Instructor: 4.3
Course: 4.1

All 1 instructors · Sort & filter

1 of 1 instructors

Richard Nielsen

Professor, Management & Organization · CSOM

2 evaluations for this course

Instructor: 4.3
Course: 4.1

About this course

The course focuses on methods we can use individually and together in addressing ethics issues and in helping to build and maintain ethical communities and organizations within different types of political-economic environments and realities. Methods considered include: ethics reasoning, dialogue, and persuasion methods; win-win negotiating and incentive methods; win-lose, nonviolent forcing and compliance methods; internal due process and governance methods; and alternative institution building and social movement methods.

All evaluation ratings

Averages use numerical 1–5 ratings, including the ratings submitted with new anonymous reviews.

OrganizationHow well the course was organized: 4.42 / 5
ChallengeHow intellectually challenging students found it: 4.37 / 5
AttendanceHow necessary attendance was: 4.21 / 5
AssignmentsHow helpful assignments were: Not collected

Weekly effort: Not collected

Estimated from the original workload response buckets. Individual sections may differ.

Evaluation history Browse all evaluations

Evaluation history 2 terms

All available terms for THEO1342. Numerical averages use the five-point scale.
Term	Evaluations	Course rating	Instructor rating
Spring 2021	1	4.3	4.5
Spring 2020	1	3.9	4.0