The decision in one scan
Start with the overall signal, then use comments and course-level evidence to understand what is behind it.
4.55Instructor rating17 evaluations
4.31Course rating17 evaluations
17Structured evaluations8 courses
3Written commentsRead separately
Spring 2025Latest evaluation termMost recent record
Instructor rating and course rating answer different questions. Written comments do not change either average.
Written comments
All 3 public comments attached to this professor, shown without a user identifier.
Professor comes across as personable, but the course itself was difficult to navigate due to an unorganized structure and repetitive content. Assignments focused on niche topics, and expectations were often unclear. Feedback could feel discouraging if those expectations weren’t met.
Very nice guy and great priest, but not a very good professor. You don't really have to go to class as long as you pick up the lecture notes, but the exams are weirdly difficult and specific and require a lot of studying and rote memorization of dates. Not an easy core class
Very nice guy, very bad professor. Gives you the notes of class and hw not graded which is great, but exams are very specific and essay topics are so specific to the exact dates and niche topics. Honestly do not take this class if you want it for an easy history core